Understanding the Tyler rationale: Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction in historical context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.156Parole chiave:
Tyler rationale, curriculum development, evaluation, teacher participation in curriculum developmentAbstract
This historical study attempts to contribute to our understanding of the widely recognized and widely critiqued Tyler rationale for the development of curriculum and instruction by explaining it in the historical context in which Ralph Tyler developed it, by tracing its origins in Tyler’s work, and by reconstructing a history of the course, Education 360, Tyler taught at the University of Chicago. This analysis found that Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction, which emerged from Tyler’s field work with teachers and professors and his conception of evaluation, is best understood as a study guide that Tyler prepared for the use of his students in the course by that name that he taught during the 1940s and 1950s. This analysis found that Tyler’s rationale was remarkable in its time for its embrace of three curriculum sources, its conception of education essentially as experience, its approach to assessment as evaluation rather than as measurement, its approach to curriculum development as a problem-solving process, and its commitment to teacher participation in the development of curriculum and instruction.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Adler, M. J. (1940, December 1). God and the professors: Our education cannot support democracy. Vital Speeches of the Day, 7(4), 98-103.
Aikin, W. M. (1942). The story of the Eight-Year Study. NY: Harper.
Announcements: The University of Chicago: The College and the Divisions. (1938-39 through 1961-62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Antonelli, G. A. (1972). Ralph W. Tyler: The man and his work. Peabody Journal of Education, 50(1), 68-74.
Bagley, W. C. (1938, April). An essentialist’s platform for the advancement of American education. Educational Administration and Supervision, 24(4), 241-256.
Beard, C. A. (1932). A charter for the social studies. NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Bellack, A. A. (1969). History of curriculum thought and practice. Review of Educational Research, 39(3), 283-292.
Bobbitt, F. (1918). The curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Bobbitt, F. (1924). How to make a curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Brown, W. H., & Robinson, W. A. (1946). Serving negro schools: A report on the Secondary School Study, its purposes working techniques and findings. Atlanta, GA: Atlanta University School of Education, for the Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools for Negroes.
Caswell, H. L. (1966). Emergence of the curriculum as a field of professional work and study. In Robinson, H. F. (Ed.), Precedents and promise in the curriculum field (pp. 1-11). NY: Teachers College Press.
Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D. S. (1935). Curriculum development. NY: American Book Company.
Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D. S. (Eds.). (1937). Readings in curriculum development. NY: American Book Company.
Chapman, P. D. (1988). Schools as sorters: Lewis Terman, applied psychology, and the intelligence testing movement, 1890-1930. NY: New York University Press.
Charters, W. W. (1923). Curriculum construction. NY: Macmillan.
Childs, J. L. (1956). American pragmatism and education. NY: Henry Holt and Company.
Clifford, G. J., & Guthrie, J. W. (1988). Ed school. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Bulletin 1918, No. 35, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Cooperative Study in General Education. (1947). Cooperation in general education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Counts, G. S. (1932/1978). Dare the schools build a new social order? Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Davis, O. L., Jr. (2005). Prelude to professional identity and organization: American public school curriculum workers and their annual meetings, 1927-1929. In Burlbaw, L. M., & Field, S. L. (Eds.), Explorations in curriculum history (pp. 39-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. NY: Macmillan.
Dewey, J. (1991/1937). Democracy and educational administration. In Boydson, J. A. (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953, Vol. II: 1935-1937 (pp. 217-225). Carbondale,IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
DuBois, P. H. (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Dzuback, M. A. (1991). Robert M. Hutchins: Portrait of an educator. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Echols, J. P. (1973). The rise of the evaluation movement: 1920-1942. (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Education 360--Basic principles of curriculum and instruction, Summer, 1948 [Course Outline]. Ralph W. Tyler Papers, Series II, Box 26, Folder 13, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Educational Policies Commission. (1944). Education for ALL American youth. Washington, DC.
Ellis, A. K., & Fouts, J. T. (1997). Research on educational innovations (2nd Ed.). Larchmount, NY: Eye on Education.
Finder, M. (2004). Educating America: How Ralph W. Tyler taught America to teach. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Franklin, B. M. (1987). Education for an urban America: Ralph Tyler and the curriculum field. In Goodson, I. (Ed.), International perspectives in curriculum history (pp. 277-296). London: Croom Helm.
Giles, H. H., McCutchen, S. P., & Zechiel, A. N. (1942). Exploring the curriculum: The work of the Thirty Schools from the viewpoint of curriculum consultants. NY: Harper.
Goodlad, J. I. (1995, March). Ralph Tyler: The educator’s educator. Educational Policy, 75-81.
Gwynn, J. M. (1960). Curriculum principles and social trends. NY: Macmillan.
Hanley, B., & Montgomery, J. (2002). Contemporary curriculum practices and their theoretical bases. In Colwell, R., & Richardson, C. (Eds.). The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning (pp. 113-143). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Harvard Committee on the Objectives of a General Education in a Free Society. (1945). General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1992). Amid behavioural and behaviouristic objectives: Reappraising appraisals of the Tyler rationale. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(6), 533-547.
Hlebowitsh, P. S. (1995). Interpretations of the Tyler Rationale: A reply to Kliebard. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 89-94.
Hutchins, R. M. (1936). The higher learning in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kandel, I. L. (1938, June). As essentialists would have it. Parents Magazine, 13(6), 22, 66-67.
Kilpatrick, W.H. (1925). The foundations of method. NY: Macmillan.
Kliebard, H. M. (1970). Reappraisal: The Tyler rationale. School Review, 78, 259-272.
Kliebard, H. M. (1995). The Tyler Rationale revisited. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 81-88.
Kolodziey, H. M. (1986). Ralph W. Tyler: A bibliography, 1929-1986. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. Ralph W. Tyler Papers, Series IV, Box 56, Folder 1, Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Kridel, C., & Bullough, R. V. (2007). Stories of the Eight-Year Study: Reexamining secondary education in America. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Lackey, G. H., & Rowls, M. D. (1989). Wisdom in education: The views of Ralph Tyler. Columbia, SC: Museum of Education, University of South Carolina.
Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levy, R. D. (1972). A study of Ralph W. Tyler’s statement, development, and later modifications of his rationale as set forth in Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. (Unpublished Ed.D. dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Madaus, G. F., & Stufflebeam, D. (Eds.). (1989). Educational evaluation: Classic works of Ralph W. Tyler. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues (4th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
National Education Association. (1893). Report of the Committee on Secondary School Studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Nevins, A. (1942, May 3). American history for Americans. New York Times Magazine, 6, 28.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P, & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum. NY: Peter Lang.
Schubert, W. H. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. NY: Macmillan.
Schubert, W. H., Schubert, A. L. L., Thomas, T. P., & Carroll, W. M. (2002). Curriculum books: The first hundred years. (2nd Ed.). NY: Peter Lang.
Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum development in the postmodern era. (2nd Ed.). NY: Routledge.
Smith, B. O., Stanley, W. O., & Shores, J. H. (1950). Fundamentals of curriculum development. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.
Snyder, T. D., & Hoffman, C. M. (2003). Digest of education statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
Sokal, M. M. (Ed.). (1987). Psychological testing and American society, 1890-1930. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Sork, T. J. (2000). Planning educational programs. In Wilson, A. L. & Hayes, E. R. (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 171-190). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Southern Association Study in Secondary Schools and Colleges. (1946). Cooperative Study for the Improvement of Education: A Staff Report of the Southern Association Study in Secondary Schools and Colleges Prepared by Frank C. Jenkins, Druzilla C. Kent, Verner M. Sims, Eugene A. Waters. Birmingham? Commission on Curricular Problems and Research, Southern Association of Colleges and Secondary Schools.
Stratemeyer, F. B., Forkner, H. L., McKim, M. G., & Passow, A. H. (1957). Developing a curriculum for modern living. (2nd Ed.). NY: Bureau of Publication, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Taba, H. (1932). The dynamics of education. NY: Harcourt Brace.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1980). Curriculum development: Theory into practice. NY: Macmillan.
Tanner, D., & Tanner, L. N. (1995). Curriculum development: Theory into Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Tyler, R. W. (1931a). A generalized technique for conducting achievement tests. Educational Research Bulletin, 10(8), 199-208.
Tyler, R. W. (1931b). Nature of learning activities. Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 22-29.
Tyler, R. W. (1933). Formulating objectives for tests. Educational Research Bulletin, 12(8), 197-206.
Tyler, R. W. (1939). Co-operation in the study of institutional problems. In John D. Russell (ed.). The Outlook for Higher Education [Proceedings of the Institute for Administrative Officers of Higher Institutions, 1939, vol. XI] (pp. 230-243). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, R. W. (1947). Syllabus for Education 360: Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. [Mimeographed manuscript] Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Bookstore. Special Collections Research Center, University of Chicago Library.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. [Twenty-ninth impression, 1969] Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, R. W. (1950a). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Syllabus for Education 360. [Ninth impression, 1957] Chicago, IL: Syllabus Division, The University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, R. W. (1950b). The organization of learning experiences. In Herrick, Virgil E., & Tyler Ralph W. (Eds.), Toward improved curriculum theory Supplementary Educational Monographs no. 71 (pp. 59-67). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, R. W. (1953). Leadership role of the school administrator in curriculum and instruction. The Elementary School Journal, LIV(4), 200-209.
Tyler, R. W. (1966). New dimensions in curriculum development. Phi Delta Kappan, 48(1), 25-28.
Tyler, R. W. (1986). Recollections of fifty years of work in curriculum. Journal of Thought, 21(1), 70-74.
Tyler, R. W. (1987). Education: Curriculum development and evaluation: Oral history transcript. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Regional Oral History Office.
Tyler, R. W., Schubert, W., & Schubert, A. L. L. (1986). A dialogue with Ralph Tyler. Journal of Thought, 21(1), 91-118.
Waples, D., & Tyler, R. W. (1930). Research methods and teachers’ problems: A manual for systematic studies of classroom procedure. NY: Macmillan.
Whipple, G. M. (Ed.). (1926). The foundations of curriculum-making. Part II of the Twenty-Sixth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
White, W. T. (1977). The study of education at the University of Chicago, 1892-1958. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Wraga, W. G. (2016). Arresting the decline of integrity in curriculum studies in the United States: The policy of [sic] opportunity. In Paraskeva, Joao M., & Steinberg, Shirley R. (Eds.), Curriculum: Decanonizing the field (pp. 99-110). NY: Peter Lang.
