Paulo Freire and Pope Francis on Dialogue: an Anticolonial Interpretation

Darren J. Dias

doi:10.14516/ete.517

Autori

Darren J. Dias University of St Michael’s College, Toronto. Canada Autore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.517

Parole chiave:

Paulo Freire, Pope Francis, dialogue, liberation theology, anticolonial

Abstract

This article aims to further the concept of dialogue beyond language exchange that includes a strategic element in anticolonialism. It examines the concept of dialogue found in the thought of two of modern-day Latin America’s most influential thinkers: Paulo Freire and Pope Francis. It argues that in different manners, both authors’ concept of dialogue can be considered anticolonial. The article compares and contrasts Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed with Francis’ recent encyclical Fratelli Tutti. Both texts culminate in a deep and detailed analysis of dialogue. Bringing these two important thinkers into conversation reveals central characteristics of dialogue from a colonized perspective and the importance that dialogue has in anticolonial discourses and practises. The article gives a detailed presentation of each author’s understanding of dialogue before highlighting common and complementary features. It then explores some resonances that Freire and Francis’ approach to dialogue has with anticolonial concerns. Dialogue as an anticolonial practise is for both Freire and Francis rooted in a philosophical and theological anthropology of what is means to be human and what de-humanizing practices look like. The article concludes by suggesting themes such as pluriversality, polycentrism, border-crossing, and critical thinking that are found in Pedagogy of the Oppressed and Fratelli Tutti mark these works as achievements in anti/decolonial thought.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Amankwah, J. M. (2007). Dialogue: The Church and the Voice of the Other. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Barnes, M. (2002). Theology and the Dialogue of Religions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barros, S. (2020). Paulo Freire in a Hall of Mirrors. Educational Theory, 70(2), 151-169.

Clark, G. (2008). Can We Talk? Augustine and the Possibility of Dialogue. In Goldhill. S. (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 117-134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cornille, C. (2008). The Im-possibility of Interreligious Dialogue. New York: Crossroad.

Dias, D. (2016). Each in Their Own Language: Dialogue in the New Pentecost. Science et Esprit, 68(4), 243-256.

Dias, D. (2020). Interreligious Dialogue as Language Negotiation. Religious Studies and Theology, 39(2), 210-224.

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 50th Anniversary Edition, Myra Bergman Ramos (trans). New York: Bloomsbury.

Giroux. H. A. (2009). Paulo Freire and the Politics of Postcolonialism. In Kempf (Ed.) Breaching the Colonial Contract. Explorations of Educational Purpose (pp. 79-89). Dordercht: Springer.

Goldhill, S. (2008). Why Don’t Christians Dialogue. In Goldhill. S., (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 1-12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greenwood, E. (2008). Fictions of Dialogue in Thucydides. In Goldhill, S. (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 15-28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gutierrez, G. (1973). A Theology of Liberation, (Sr. Caridad Indo and John Eagleson, trans.). Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

Gutierrez, G. (1996). Between Babel and Pentecost. In Gutierrez, G., Essential Writings. Edited by James B. Nickoloff. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.

Hinze, B. E. (2016). Decolonizing Everyday Practises: Site of Struggle in Church and Society. CTSA Proceedings 71.

Koning, J. (2008). Sympotic Dialogue in the First to the Fifth Centuries CE. In Goldhill, S. (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 85-114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirylo J. D., & Drick, B. (2017). Paulo Freire, His Faith Spirituality, and Theology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Lipari, L. (2014). On Interlistening and the Idea of Dialogue. Theory and Psychology, 24(4), 504-523.

Long, Alex. (2008). Plato’s Dialogues and a Common Rationale for Dialogue Form. In Goldhill, S. (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 45-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miroff, N. You can’t understand Pope Francis without Juan Peron – and Evita, Washington Post, August 1, 2015, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/you-cant-understand-pope-francis-without-juan-peron--and-evita/2015/08/01/d71e6fa4-2fd0-11e5-a879-213078d03dd3_story.html.

Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Mbembe, A. (2019). Necro-politics. Steven Corcoran (trans). Durham: Duke University Press.

Milner, S. (2002). Renaissance Dialogues. In Hainsworth, P., & Roby, D. (Eds), The Oxford Companion to Italian Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Napolitano, V. (2019). Francis, a Criollo Pope. Religion and Society: Advances in Research, 10(1), 63-80.

O’Malley, J. W. (2008). What Happened at Vatican II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Pope, F. (2020). Fratelli Tutti: The Encyclical Letter on Fraternity and Social Friendship. Maryknoll: Orbis.

Schofield, M. (2008). Ciceronian Dialogue. In Goldhill, S. (Ed.), The End of Dialogue in Antiquity (pp. 63-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sweeney, E. (2019). Literary Forms of Medieval Philosophy. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/medieval-literary (last accessed, June 4, 2021).

Swidler, L. (2018). Dialogue: The Latest Mark of Modernity. Journal of Ecumenical Studies, 53(4), 453-460.

Taylor, C. (2016). The Language Animal: The Full Shape of Human Linguistic Capacity. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Weigand, E. (2010). Language as Dialogue. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(3), 505-515.