«Freinet Chimneys»: Experimenting with Emancipatory Public Education (Geneva in the 60s to 80s). Piaget’s Dream of an Active School?

Authors

  • Rita Hofstetter University of Geneva. Switzerland Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.248

Keywords:

Protagonism in the 1960s, Piagetian endorsement, Geneva Freinet Group, alternatives in public education, controversial democratisation

Abstract

The emancipatory potential of the 1960s had a particular resonance in Swiss education in the French-speaking part of the country. Teachers, parents and unionists, all advocating Freinet pedagogy, demanded that the demonised public education be reformed. Retracing the main steps of their successes and setbacks in the sector of Geneva public education, this article enquires into the rhetorical strategies and tactical alliances the reformists mobilised in order to promote «schools open to life», respectful of the natural longing to learn thanks to educational streams in primary schools dedicated to their cause (the «Freinet chimneys» implemented for a while at the turn of the 1980s). Inputs address the way the leaders of the reform historicised their initiatives so as to establish rightful filiation, calling upon some major figures whilst neglecting others. The scientific approval of Jean Piaget and Élise Freinet, as well as part of the left-wing party in power, might have endorsed the project; nonetheless, the leading figures of Geneva New Education were rarely invoked. How should we interpret these twists and turns? How were the narratives being scripted, and by whom? How were the innovations tested by others and integrated elsewhere so as to support the public education reform? Analysis of the underlying dynamics of this experiment reveal how «everyday» people rose up in a crisis and seized the opportunity to open up a world of possibilities; this can be highlighted through the lenses of the notion of «protagonism», which brings together «ordinary» people and their «extraordinary» politicisation (Bantigny, 2018; Deluermoz & Gobille, 2015).

References

Bantigny, L. (2018). 1968. De grands soirs en petits matins. Paris: Seuil.

Batou, J. (2018, in press). Conclusion: Quand le monde s’invite en Suisse. Les années 68 au pays de Guillaume Tell. In Schaufelbuehl, J. M. (Ed.), 68 in der Schweiz – eine unvollendete Geschichte 68 en Suisse – une histoire inachevée.

Beattie, N. (2002). The Freinet movements of France, Italy and Germany 1920-2000: versions of educational progressivism. Lewinston–Lampeter: Mellen Press.

Berthoud, Ch. (2016). Le cycle d’orientation genevois. Une école secondaire pour démocratiser l’accès à la culture 1927-1977. Gollio: Infolio.

Braster, S., Simon, F., & Grosvenor. J. (2011). Educating the People: the History of Popular Education. Paedagogica Historica, XLVII.

Clanché, P. Debarbieux, E., & Testanière, J. (Ed.) (1994). La Pédagogie Freinet, mises à jour et perspectives. Bordeaux: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.

De Coster, T., Simon, F., & Depaepe, M. (2009). «Alternative» education in Flanders, 1960-2000: transformation of knowledge in a neo-liberal context. Paedagogica Historica, 45(4-5), 645-670.

Deluermoz, Q., & Gobille, B. (2015). Protagonisme et crises politiques. Individus «ordinaires» et politisations «extraordinaires», Politix, 4(112).

Durand, G., Hofstetter, R., & Pasquier, G. (Ed.). (2015). Les bâtisseurs de l’école romande. 150 ans du syndicat des enseignants romands et de l’Educateur. Genève: Georg.

Frei, N. (2008). 1968: Jugendrevolte und globaler Protest. Münich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

Gather Thurler, M. (2000). L’innovation négociée: une porte étroite. Revue française de pédagogie, 130, 29-42.

Go, H. L. (2007). Freinet à Vence: vers une reconstruction de la forme scolaire. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.

Go, H.L., & Riondet, X. (2018). À côté de Freinet. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy-Éditions de Lorraine.

Haramein, A, Hutmacher, W., & Perrenoud, Ph. (1979). Vers une action pédagogique égalitaire: pluralisme des contenus et différenciation des interventions. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 5(2), 227-270.

Hernández Huerta, J. L. (2011). La influencia de Celestin Freinet en España (1926-1939). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.

Heinen, J. (2018). 1968… Des années d’espoirs. Lausanne: Antipodes.

Hofstetter, R. (2010). Genève: creuset des sciences de l’éducation. Genève: Droz.

Hofstetter, R., Ratcliff, M., & Schneuwly, B. (2012). Cent ans de vie (1912-2012). La Faculté de psychologie et des sciences de l’éducation, héritière de l’Institut Rousseau et de l’ère piagétienne. Genève: Georg.

Hofstetter, R., Vellas, E., & Barras, V. (1996). Histoire et actualité d’une innovation pédagogique. L’Unité coopérative d’Onex-Bosson (1976-1996). Genève: UCE-GGEM.

Klimke, M., & Scharloth, J. (Ed.) (2008). 1968 in Europe. A History of Protest and Activism, 1956–1977.

Kornetis, K. (2009). «Everything Links»? Temporality, Territoriality and Cultural Transfer in the ’68 Protest Movements. Historein, 9, 34-45.

Magnin, Ch. (1997). Le parlement genevois et l’égalité d’accès à l’instruction 1885-1950. (Thèse de doctorat). Université de Lausanne (Sciences sociales et politiques).

Marvick, A. (2011). The Sixties. Cultural Revolution in Britain, France, Italy and United States c.1958-c-1978. London: Bloomsbury Reader.

Nicole, M. (1991). Cycles de mémoire. Chronique irrévérencieuse et véridique ou l’histoire d’une aventure pédagogique 1962-1980. Genève: Pfirter.

Payà Rico, A., Hernández Huerta, J. L., Cagnolati, A., González Gómez, S., & Valero Gómez, S. (Ed.). (2018). Globalizing the student rebellion in the long ’68 (A. M. Gómez Sánchez Ed. care). Salamanca: FahrenHouse.

Peyronie H. (2013). Le mouvement Freinet: du fondateur charismatique à l’intellectuel collectif. Regards socio-historiques sur une alternative éducative et pédagogique. Caen: Presses universitaires de Caen.

Piaget (1948/1972/1988). Le droit à l’éducation dans le monde actuel. Où va l’éducation. UNESCO: Denoël/Gonthier.

Piaget, J. (1973). The understand is to invent: the futur of education [transl. by Georges-Anne Roberts]. New York: Grossmann.

Pintassilgo, J. & Raquel, P. (2014). Ensino da História e inovação pedagógica na transição para a democracia (Portugal, Anos 60 e 70 do século XX). História Hoje. Revista Eletrônica de História e Ensino. ANPUH, Brasil, 2(4), 125-148.

Poussière, Ph. (1984). Autogérer l’utopie pédagogique. Le cas de l’Unité d’Enseignement Secondaire (UES) à Genève. (Thèse de doctorat). Université de Genève (FPSE).

Robert, A., & Garnier, B. (Ed.) (2015). La pensée critique des enseignants. Eléments d’histoire et de théorisation. Saint-Agnan: PURH.

Sherman, D., & Van Dijk, Alinder, J. & Aneesh, A. (Ed.). (2013). The Long 1968. Revisions and New Perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Todaro, L. (Ed.) (2018). Dismantling Authoritarianism: Changes in Education across the Transition from the 1960s to 1970s. Espacio, Tiempo y Educación, 5(1), 1-11.

Ueberschlag, J. (2015). Le groupe d’Éducation nouvelle d’Eure-et-Loir et l’essor du mouvement Freinet (1927-1947). Caen: Presses universitaires de Caen.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-01