«Rationale Trennung» or «Marriage d’Amour»? History and Philosophy of Educational Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14516/ete.160Keywords:
History, philosophy, Educational Sciences, methodological fetishes of modernity, permeability of academic disciplinesAbstract
This article focuses on disciplinary interrelationships between philosophy and history within the framework of educational sciences. It deals with the epistemological, material, political, and categorical conditions of permeability, some of which initiate a separation of historical science from philosophy, whereas others allow, on the one hand, for history to profit from philosophy and, on the other, for philosophy to profit from history. The article illustrates how both history and philosophy benefit through reciprocal openness within education as an academic field. Permeability between history and philosophy in educational research may draw attention to lacunae on both sides and challenge methodological stereotypes and seemingly unavoidable dispositions of reasoning, the recognition of which may contribute to an enrichment of educational research.
References
Bal, M. (2009). Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Barthes, R. (1985). Die helle Kammer. Bemerkung zur Photographie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Bennett, T. (1995). The Birth of the Museum. History, Theory, Politics. London, New York: Routledge.
Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2013). An exploration of the writing and reading of a life: The «body parts» of the Victorian school architect E.R. Robson. In Popkewitz, Thomas S. (Ed.), Rethinking the history of education: Transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge (pp. 220-223). New York: Palgrave.
Charles G. Nauert (2006). Humanism and the Culture of Renaissance Europe (New Approaches to European History). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chartier, R., & Cavallo, G. (Ital. 1995/Germ. 1999) (eds.). Die Welt des Lesens. Von der Schriftrolle zum Bildschirm. Frankfurt/M., Paris: Campus, Editions de la Maison de Sciences de l’Homme.
Fendler, L. (2008). The upside of presentism. Paedagogica Historica, 44(6), 677-690.
Fendler, L. (2012). The educational problems of aesthetic taste. In Priem, K., Casale, R., & König, G. M. (Eds.), Die Materialität der Erziehung. Kulturelle und soziale Aspekte pädagogischer Objekte, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 58, 66-80.
Fendler, L. (2013). There are no independent variables in history. In Popkewitz, Thomas S. (Ed.), Rethinking the history of education: Transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge (pp. 223-243). New York: Palgrave.
Fendler, L. (2014). Unhinging modernity: Historiographical periodization as effective history. In Franklin, B.M., & Pereyra, M. (Eds.), Systems of reason and the politics of schooling: Alternative studies on school reforms and sciences of education in the thinking of Thomas S. Popkewitz (pp. 225-238). New York: Routledge.
Fendler, L., & Priem, K. (2013). Material contexts and creation of meaning in virtual places. Web 2.0 as a space of educational research. In Depaepe, M., Smeyers, P., & Keiner, E. (Eds.), Educational Research: The importance and effects of institutional spaces (pp. 177-191). Dordrecht et al: Springer.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. London: Travistock.
Gombrich, E. (1982). The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representations. London: Phaidon.
Gumbrecht, H. U. (2004). Diesseits der Hermeneutik. Die Produktion von Präsenz. (Joachim Schulte, Trans.). Frankfurt: Edition Suhrkamp. (English original, Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, published in 2004.)
Heidegger, M. (1927/2006). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer (19th ed.).
Kittsteiner, H. D. (1993). Nietzsches «souveränes Individuu» in seiner plastischen Kraft. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 2, 294-316.
Nietzsche, F. (1874). Unzeitgemäße Betrachtungen, 2. Vom Nutzen und Nachteil der Historie für das Leben: http://www.nietzsche.tv/unzeitgemaesse-betrachtungen-2.html (5/9/2013)
Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt. Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts. München: Beck.
Priem, K. (2001). «Der ewige Hunger des Gefühls» – Säkularreligiöse Aspekte in Sprangers Kulturpädagogik und Kulturpsychologie. In Meyer-Willner, G. (Ed.), Eduard Spranger. Aspekte seines Werks aus heutiger Sicht (pp. 121-141). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
Priem K., Casale, R., & G. M. König (2012) (Ed.). Die Materialität der Erziehung. Kulturelle und soziale Aspekte pädagogischer Objekte, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft 58.
Priem, K. (2014). Visual, literary, and numerical perspectives on education: Materiality, presence, and interpretation. In Depaepe, M. &. Smeyers, P (Eds.), Educational research: Material culture and its representation (pp. 53-69). Dordrecht: Springer.
Priem, K., & Fendler, L. (2015). «Rationale Trennung» oder «Marriage d´Amour»? Zum Verhältnis von Geschichte und Philosophie in der Erziehungswissenschaft, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 5, 643-664.
Safranski, R. (2000). Nietzsche. Biographie seines Denkens. München, Wien: Carl Hanser.
Sobe, N. (2013). Entanglement and transnationalism in the history of American education. In Popkewitz, Thomas S. (Ed.), Rethinking the history of education: Transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge (pp. 93-108). New York: Palgrave.
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, Z.J. (2013). Chinese mode of historical thinking and its transformation in pedagogical discourse. In Popkewitz, Thomas S. (Ed.), Rethinking the history of education: Transnational perspectives on its questions, methods, and knowledge (pp. 51-73). New York: Palgrave.
